Alboin, the Iron Crown, and the Lombards

The fall of the Roman Empire was by no means a pretty thing, and by the mid 6th Century, less than a century after Odovakar sent the last Emperor into exile, the Italian Peninsula, once the heart of the Empire, was completely war-torn.  Odovakar had been murdered in 493 by the Ostrogothic king Theodoric, but the Byzantine Empire, the residual eastern half of the Roman Empire that was not dissolved with Odovakar’s dismissal of the Emperor, was not about to let the most densely populated region in Europe go so easily.  Repeated campaigns by the Byzantines ravaged the countryside even worse, but internal political machinations within the Byzantine Empire did not allow any permanent gains to be made.

It is upon this background that our story begins, when the Ostrogoths were permanently conquered by the rebounding Byzantine Empire, which appeared poised to re-take all of the former Roman Empire and more.  Mostly ignored at the time were the events happening in the Danube River valley.

roman-empire_565ad
An extremely busy map of the Mediterranean World in 565

So, One thing you’ll notice is that on the northern border of the Byzantine (here called Roman, because that’s basically what it was) are a few bigger kingdoms, namely the Lombards and Gepids.  You’ll see Lombard spelled a bunch of different ways if you research this for yourself, so don’t worry about all that, but the important part to remember here is that the Lombards are in an extremely unpleasant area of the world.  It’s cold, but it really doesn’t rain as much as you think it would, and for the farming techniques available at the time, most of it was unarable (unfarmable).  As a result, the Lombards were really looking for a place that was not where they were, which led them to fight with their neighbors, the Gepids, constantly.

In 552, the Lombards scored a big win on the Gepids.   Most of our history on this stuff comes from Paul the Deacon, who wrote down largely what he was told by Lombards several decades after it happened, but it seems like the Lombard prince Alboin, killed the son of the Gepid king in what was a complete rout.  External sources do confirm this, because the Byzantine Emperor Justinian intervened on the behalf of the Gepids, hoping to keep the Gepids and Lombards at each others’ throats so that they wouldn’t turn to the logical next target – the fabulously wealthy Byzantines.

Justinian’s plan seems to have worked at first.  Somewhere probably after 560, Alboin succeeded his father to the crown of the Lombards and waged a new war against the Gepids.  In 565, the Byzantines intervened once more, although they were by this point much weaker than they had been and were ruled by a new Emperor, Justin II.  Either way, the Gepids and Byzantines combined were more than enough to wipe out the Lombards.  Alboin, seeing no other option, formed an alliance with Bayan I, Khagan of the Avars, but it came at a price.  Bayan demanded that the Gepids’ lands belong to him at the conclusion of the war, plus half the war booty, much of the Lombards’ cattle, and a tenth of the Lombards’ lands.  By 568, the Gepid kingdom had been annihilated and subjugated by the Avar horde, and Alboin had slain the Gepid king, taking his daughter, Rosamund, as his new wife.

It didn’t take long for Alboin to realize that he had made a deal with the devil, and Bayan’s posturing made it clear that before long, he would turn on his old ally and take the Lombards’ lands.  Alboin determined that he and his people, as they had a century before, would have to migrate south, this time into Italy.  Somewhere between 150,000 and 300,000 Lombards around a third of whom would have been fighting fit warriors, made the trek from their homelands in Pannonia to the Italian Peninsula.  On Easter Sunday of 568, the Lombards departed, and they don’t show back up on the historical record for a year.

To this day, it is unclear as to whether the Byzantines even knew the Lombards were coming.  They were certainly unprepared, but then again, not many countries could be compared for 50-100,000 soldiers invading with an entire nation in tow.  No Germanic tribe had done this for almost a century, and the Lombards would be one of the last.  Paul the Deacon says that Alboin entered Italy “without any hindrance,” which would suggest that the Byzantines were entirely unaware of the impending crisis, and they were never able to put together a coherent response.

One of the major issues with Alboin’s invasion was that Alboin was an Arian Christian – one who believed that Jesus was not God but rather a special creation of God, neither god nor man, designed to atone for the sins of the world.  Arianism had been condemned at the 325 Council of Nicaea (in which Saint Nicholas punched Arius in the face, true story; that’s the same Saint Nicholas who is now your beloved Santa Claus), but the Arians had been much more aggressive missionaries than the orthodox Nicaean Christians had been.  Because of this, most of the invading Germanic tribes had, at least at first, converted to Arianism.  Through a complicated series of events that I have nowhere near enough time for, Arianism had more or less disappeared, particularly after the fall of the Ostrogothic Kingdom in 553.  Now, fifteen years later, another major Arian power was making its presence known.

The Byzantines viewed their struggle against the Lombards as a Holy War, and the influx of heretics into Italy would serve as a catalyst for Pope Gregory the Great (590-604) to lead a sort of evangelistic revival in the Church that would lead to the establishment of the institution we now call the Catholic Church.

Literally the first evidence of anybody resisting the Lombards is at Pavia…

2000px-pavia_in_italy-svg

Right there.  The Lombards had marched clear across Northern Italy and nobody had said a thing.  The issue that the Lombards ran into was that they weren’t used to siege warfare of any sort, and so when a walled city finally refused to surrender out of sheer terror, the Lombards just had to sit outside and wait.  This was not something they were good at, and so while Alboin sat there with the main army, his men scattered all around, raiding Burgundy to the Northwest and moving farther south and taking more land.

Alboin also apparently became an alcoholic at this time (although it’s possible that he had been for a while, the unfamiliar Byzantine liquor might have been too strong for him), and an initially ambitious and warlike king became apathetic and lazy.  Pavia fell in the spring of 572, after over two years of siege, and Alboin declared a new kingdom of the Lombards, allegedly forging for himself an Iron Crown (more on that later), but the title was, by this point, meaningless.  His men had already fought and lost to the Burgundians without his presence or permission.  They had conquered much of Southern Italy without his blessing as well.  Alboin was a figurehead, if even that.

Things came to a head in June of 572, as Alboin’s wife, Rosamund, plotted to murder him.  Mind you, we mentioned that Alboin had killed her father fourteen years before, and she probably didn’t just forget about that.  Now, a lot of people diverge on the story of Alboin’s murder.  Gregory of Tours, a generally solid source but not one who specialized in the Lombards, says that Rosamund had simply bode her time until the opportune moment, whereupon she decided to poison the Lombard king.

Paul the Deacon tells the story differently.  He says that Alboin had gotten drunk, as usual, and had been using Rosamund’s father’s skull as a drinking vessel.  This might sound like a fantastic tale, but this has been done a lot through history, even as late as the 13th Century among the Bulgars.  The Bulgars and Avars seem to have been pretty big fans of the whole skull-drinking thing, and it’s not unlikely that Alboin, seeing the ferocity and speed with which the Avars subdued their enemies, became something of an admirer of the practice.  One way or another, he began to taunt his wife and even forced her to drink from her own father’s skull, which rekindled Rosamund’s desire to see Alboin dead.

With no real succession plan in place, the assassination of Alboin led to a downward spiral among the Lombards that led to a ten-year period known as the Rule of the Dukes.  It would not be until 584, when a foolish invasion of Burgundy would result in a Frankish alliance against the Lombards, that the Lombards would, only out necessity, reunite under a single king.

“King of the Lombards” would never be a powerful title, as the Lombard dukes preferred to maintain their own rights in their own principalities, but the title became symbolically important, as the myth of the Iron Crown grew.  Later, when declaring their own position as “King of Italy,” the kings of the Germans would take an iron crown they claimed had been forged by Alboin himself, giving a certain ancient rite to their position.  Of course, few German kings were ever able to exercise practical control in Italy, but the myth was created by Alboin, who permanently broke Byzantine hegemony in the Italian Peninsula.

alboin27s_italy
The Lombard territories at the death of Alboin in 572

The Kingmakers – The Rise and Fall of the Praetorian Guard

As Augustus became the first Roman Emperor in 27 BC, many changes came to the government, among which was the establishment of an imperial bodyguard – called the Praetorian Guard.  The Praetorians were considered among the most elite units of the Roman military, but their existence posed a few problems for the emperors, for the Praetorians were typically more loyal to their own officers than they were to the emperor.

Augustus’ successor, Tiberius, was wisely wary of the Praetorians.  He recognized them as his predecessor’s men and reduced their numbers, moving their quarters outside the city limits of Rome.  Tiberius’ contemporaries dismissed him as paranoid (and they were right about his being too paranoid, just not on this point), but Tiberius’ successor, Caligula, would prove him right on the Praetorian Guard.

Now, there were a lot of things wrong with Caligula, so maybe it’s not really fair to blame the Praetorians for murdering him.  After all, the man who calls himself a god, turns the palace into a brothel, deliberately wastes money on things, murders for amusement, and takes a romantic interest in his sister is probably not the sort of guy who should be running the most powerful country in the world.  Even despite all these things, the Praetorians didn’t say anything.  They drew the line at Caligula wanting to make his horse (in whom he allegedly also had a romantic interest) a consul, which would have made the animal their commanding officer – at least in name.  Caligula was talked down from making his horse a consul, settling for making it a priest (even the emperor has to compromise), but the damage to his relationship with the military, and particularly the Praetorians, had already been irreparably damaged.  The Praetorians murdered Caligula on January 24, 41 AD, setting a dangerous precedent, for the emperors they would later murder were not all horse-lovers (okay, one of them was, but they didn’t technically murder him).

The Praetorians put Caligula’s not insane uncle Claudius on the throne after him, and according to most historians, it was a decent choice.  Problems arose again when Claudius’ successor, Nero, killed his mother and started blaming the Great Fire of Rome on Christians (it pretty clearly wasn’t their fault).  Rumors of horse-loving started floating around again, and the Praetorians abandoned Nero as Galba revolted in 68 AD.  The following “Year of the Four Emperors” saw the Praetorians help Otho overthrow Galba after he had seized power, only to see Otho overthrown by Vitellius and his own army.  Vitellius wised up to the Praetorians and disbanded them, replacing them entirely with his own men.  The problem was that the Praetorians then went and joined Vespasian, another general who was staging a revolt (joke’s on you, Vitellius).  Vespasian took power in 69 and reduced the size of the Praetorian Guard again, placing his son Titus in charge as Praetorian Prefect.  Titus became emperor after his father, but he passed away a couple of years after a remarkably unhappy reign, which saw some dispute as to who would be his successor.

The Praetorian Guard solved this dispute by putting Domitian, Titus’ brother, on the throne, only to have some level of involvement in his murder fifteen years later (they at least didn’t seem to interested in preventing it).  The next handful of emperors are commonly referred to as the “Five Good Emperors” and symbolize the peak of the Roman Empire.  From 96 to 177, there was essentially no disputing the pre-eminence of the Empire, but after Marcus Aurelius’ death, his son, Commodus took the throne.

commodus6
Dangit, Joaquin.  The Empire had a good thing going.

So… Commodus was either crazy or just a jerk.  Either way, the Praetorians weren’t fans of the guy who insists on being called, “Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus Augustus Herculeus Romanus Exsuperatorius Amazonius Invictus Felix Pius.”  It’s a mouthful, and it’s also hard to only refer to someone with pronouns to avoid having to say a name that long.  When that guy starts telling people he’s a demigod and likes to fight rigged gladiatorial battles, you draw the line.  The Praetorian Prefect Laetius helped murder Commodus in 192, whereupon Pertinax was put in office.  The Praetorians decided they didn’t like Pertinax a few months later and auctioned (yes, auctioned) off the throne to Didius Julianus.  They killed him three months later, but before they could sell the throne again, the Spanish-born general Septimus Severus took the throne by force and replaced the Praetorians with his own guys (wise move, Septimus).  Septimus Severus was the first non-Roman to have taken the throne by force, and you know, the Romans didn’t seem too upset about it after having had good old “Lucius Aelius Aurelius Commodus Augustus Herculeus Romanus Exsuperatorius Amazonius Invictus Felix Pius” and the guy who bought the throne  in power for the last fifteen years.

Septimus Severus was better than his predecessors, but he still likely contributed to the Crisis of the 3rd Century, in which the Roman economy collapsed and Germanic tribesmen ravaged the frontiers with increasing impunity.  The crisis ended with the rise of the emperor Diocletian, who reorganized  the Empire into four main administrative areas in a system called the Tetrarchy.  It’s hard to deny that Diocletian was a turning point for the Empire, and under him, the Praetorian Guard began their final decline while the Empire recovered.  Diocletian removed the Praetorians from the palace in 284, and by the time of his abdication in 305 (the only Roman Emperor to do so), the Praetorians were simply a part of the city guard in Rome.  The following year, the son of the lieutenant emperor in the West, Maxentius, brought the Praetorians back one last time, as he contested the succession of Constantius Chlorus as Western Emperor.  After Maxentius’ defeat at the hands of Constantius Chlorus’ son, Constantine, at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312, Constantine marched into Rome and disbanded the Praetorian Guard permanently.

A definition of insanity is “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result,” and the dogged commitment to having the Praetorian Guard as the personal protectors of the Emperor certainly fit this definition.  Look, I’m no expert on this, but if the Secret Service murdered several Presidents in a row, maybe we would try something else, but the logic seems to have been that the Empire was doing so well in spite of the Praetorians, who eventually integrated themselves into the imperial tradition itself, that it was better just to live with them than to risk the unknown consequences of dissolving the unit.  In retrospect, a Roman Empire without the Praetorians might not have had to endure the Crisis of the 3rd Century, which irreversibly damaged the Empire.  Hypotheticals aren’t the business of the responsible historian, but it’s fair to wonder as to what might have occurred without the Praetorians, or if Vespasian would have simply removed them after the Year of the Four Emperors, rather than trying to reform the corrupt institution.